I have firsthand information about a fairly common practice that I once tried to say is isolated but know now that it exists throughout our industry and its fairly, I guess common:Giving preference on a listing through keeping it in the office or only negotiating a fellow agent's offer.
I once thought that our primary job as a realtor or real estate agent is to fully market property. To me that meant truely letting the most qualified buyer contract on the house.
Questions abound: Are we being fair to the seller even if it is a bank? Is someone participating in a deal that "channels' income to them ( In this case, having a "Wells Fargo" loan rep in the office to facilitate this deal.)? Is the buyer really going to get the best value for their money? Are we hurting our image as a realtor, being honest and legitamate?
Likewise a friend recently gave me an account of a family member that wanted to buy a house through a buyer's agent and recounted how the listing agent offered them a " special way" to get the house if they put down x amount of money. To my friend, it sounded devious.
Laws keep getting passed that dictate how we do business. In California, there is the new GOOD FAITH ESTIMATE mandated coming out soon. Taking up front fees for Loan Mods is outlawed here. Last year title companies were banned from giving us freebies because of supposed corruption. This year loan officers not of banks will need to be specially licensed by the DRE.
What I am trying to say here is that we need to be models in our profession and take extra care to avoid any PERCEPTION of wrong doing just like a pastor of a church is held to a higher level than his flock. If he has a "fling" its a crime. If his parishioners have a " fling" its well because they are sinners. You get the idea.
Comments